When claiming SR&ED (Scientific Research and Experimental Development) tax credits in Canada, businesses have two primary options: the proxy method and the traditional method. Each approach has distinct ways of handling overhead costs and salaries, and understanding the difference between them can help your business make the best financial choice.
The Traditional Method: Direct Tracking of Overhead
With the traditional method, businesses must track every overhead expense related to their SR&ED project, including costs like rent, utilities, and office supplies. While this method is more precise in accounting, it requires careful documentation to prove the expenses are directly tied to the SR&ED project. It’s most beneficial for companies that have clear SR&ED expenses and robust systems for tracking them.
The Proxy Method: Simplified Overhead Calculation
The proxy method simplifies the process by allowing businesses to claim a flat percentage of eligible salaries as overhead. Instead of recording individual expenses, a 'proxy amount' is calculated at a rate set by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). This method is easier and faster, but it may limit the total overhead claimable if actual expenses exceed the proxy amount.
Which Method Should You Choose?
The choice between methods depends on how your business operates. If you have significant trackable overhead costs, the traditional method may offer a higher credit. If you want a simpler approach, the proxy method reduces the administrative burden, even though it may not maximize the total claim.
;tldr
Choosing the right SR&ED method can streamline your tax credit process and help you recover project costs efficiently. Whether you opt for the traditional or proxy method depends on your company’s financial structure and tracking ability. Consulting an SR&ED expert can also ensure you're making the most informed decision.
